Please complete the following evaluation. Your email is only used to track submissions and allow for follow-up reminders. Your specific ratings and comments are not revealed to Conference planners.

If you have any questions or issues with the form itself please contact us at admin@afcc-md.org

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.

Email - (Required for tracking only. Responses are confidential) *

Session 1 - "Determining and Modifying Child Custody and Access Schedules" helped me:

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disgree
Recognize constructive uses of the law to promote health and each parent’s involvement.	Strongly AgreeRecognize constructive uses of the law to promote health and each parent’s involvement. Strongly Agree	AgreeRecognize constructive uses of the law to promote health and each parent’s involvement. Agree	NeutralRecognize constructive uses of the law to promote health and each parent’s involvement. Neutral	DisagreeRecognize constructive uses of the law to promote health and each parent’s involvement. Disagree	Strongly DisgreeRecognize constructive uses of the law to promote health and each parent’s involvement. Strongly Disgree
Identify specific opportunities for each parent to seek treatment and engage in healthy participation with their children	Strongly AgreeIdentify specific opportunities for each parent to seek treatment and engage in healthy participation with their children Strongly Agree	AgreeIdentify specific opportunities for each parent to seek treatment and engage in healthy participation with their children Agree	NeutralIdentify specific opportunities for each parent to seek treatment and engage in healthy participation with their children Neutral	DisagreeIdentify specific opportunities for each parent to seek treatment and engage in healthy participation with their children Disagree	Strongly DisgreeIdentify specific opportunities for each parent to seek treatment and engage in healthy participation with their children Strongly Disgree
Gain a better understanding of the tools available to assist in these cases and be better prepared in presenting cases.	Strongly AgreeGain a better understanding of the tools available to assist in these cases and be better prepared in presenting cases. Strongly Agree	AgreeGain a better understanding of the tools available to assist in these cases and be better prepared in presenting cases. Agree	NeutralGain a better understanding of the tools available to assist in these cases and be better prepared in presenting cases. Neutral	DisagreeGain a better understanding of the tools available to assist in these cases and be better prepared in presenting cases. Disagree	Strongly DisgreeGain a better understanding of the tools available to assist in these cases and be better prepared in presenting cases. Strongly Disgree

Please rate Session #1 Panel's overall:

	5-EXCELLENT	4	3	2	1-POOR
Level of knowledge and expertise	5-EXCELLENTLevel of knowledge and expertise 5-EXCELLENT	4Level of knowledge and expertise 4	3Level of knowledge and expertise 3	2Level of knowledge and expertise 2	1-POORLevel of knowledge and expertise 1-POOR
Teaching ability	5-EXCELLENTTeaching ability 5-EXCELLENT	4Teaching ability 4	3Teaching ability 3	2Teaching ability 2	1-POORTeaching ability 1-POOR
Maintained my interest	5-EXCELLENTMaintained my interest 5-EXCELLENT	4Maintained my interest 4	3Maintained my interest 3	2Maintained my interest 2	1-POORMaintained my interest 1-POOR
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions	5-EXCELLENTWas responsive to questions, comments and opinions 5-EXCELLENT	4Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 4	3Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 3	2Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 2	1-POORWas responsive to questions, comments and opinions 1-POOR

Session 2-"Personality Disorders and Mental Health Disorders: Overview of symptom patterns and effects on parenting and coparenting" helped me:

	STRONGLY AGREE	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	STRONGLY DISAGREE
Identify major personality disorder characteristics and dimensions that specifically influence parenting ability, and related functioning and behavior	STRONGLY AGREEIdentify major personality disorder characteristics and dimensions that specifically influence parenting ability, and related functioning and behavior STRONGLY AGREE	AgreeIdentify major personality disorder characteristics and dimensions that specifically influence parenting ability, and related functioning and behavior Agree	NeutralIdentify major personality disorder characteristics and dimensions that specifically influence parenting ability, and related functioning and behavior Neutral	DisagreeIdentify major personality disorder characteristics and dimensions that specifically influence parenting ability, and related functioning and behavior Disagree	STRONGLY DISAGREEIdentify major personality disorder characteristics and dimensions that specifically influence parenting ability, and related functioning and behavior STRONGLY DISAGREE
Identify personality disorder-related interpersonal patterns that have a specific negative impact on childhood development	STRONGLY AGREEIdentify personality disorder-related interpersonal patterns that have a specific negative impact on childhood development STRONGLY AGREE	AgreeIdentify personality disorder-related interpersonal patterns that have a specific negative impact on childhood development Agree	NeutralIdentify personality disorder-related interpersonal patterns that have a specific negative impact on childhood development Neutral	DisagreeIdentify personality disorder-related interpersonal patterns that have a specific negative impact on childhood development Disagree	STRONGLY DISAGREEIdentify personality disorder-related interpersonal patterns that have a specific negative impact on childhood development STRONGLY DISAGREE
Point to challenges in identifying and specifying personality disorder traits that relate to conflictual behavior associated with collaborative co-parenting, reliability, and responsibility	STRONGLY AGREEPoint to challenges in identifying and specifying personality disorder traits that relate to conflictual behavior associated with collaborative co-parenting, reliability, and responsibility STRONGLY AGREE	AgreePoint to challenges in identifying and specifying personality disorder traits that relate to conflictual behavior associated with collaborative co-parenting, reliability, and responsibility Agree	NeutralPoint to challenges in identifying and specifying personality disorder traits that relate to conflictual behavior associated with collaborative co-parenting, reliability, and responsibility Neutral	DisagreePoint to challenges in identifying and specifying personality disorder traits that relate to conflictual behavior associated with collaborative co-parenting, reliability, and responsibility Disagree	STRONGLY DISAGREEPoint to challenges in identifying and specifying personality disorder traits that relate to conflictual behavior associated with collaborative co-parenting, reliability, and responsibility STRONGLY DISAGREE

Please rate Dr. Elsa Ronningstam in Session 2 (5=Excellent,1=Poor)

	5-EXCELLENT	4	3	2	1-POOR
Level of knowledge and expertise	5-EXCELLENTLevel of knowledge and expertise 5-EXCELLENT	4Level of knowledge and expertise 4	3Level of knowledge and expertise 3	2Level of knowledge and expertise 2	1-POORLevel of knowledge and expertise 1-POOR
Teaching ability	5-EXCELLENTTeaching ability 5-EXCELLENT	4Teaching ability 4	3Teaching ability 3	2Teaching ability 2	1-POORTeaching ability 1-POOR
Maintained my interest	5-EXCELLENTMaintained my interest 5-EXCELLENT	4Maintained my interest 4	3Maintained my interest 3	2Maintained my interest 2	1-POORMaintained my interest 1-POOR
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions	5-EXCELLENTWas responsive to questions, comments and opinions 5-EXCELLENT	4Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 4	3Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 3	2Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 2	1-POORWas responsive to questions, comments and opinions 1-POOR

Session 3-Primer on Working effectively with clients with personality disorders for family law professionals. This Session helped me:

	STRONGLY AGREE	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	STRONGLY DISAGREE
Develop a better understanding of differentiating between personality styles and actual personality disorders which cause additional challenges for professionals.	STRONGLY AGREEDevelop a better understanding of differentiating between personality styles and actual personality disorders which cause additional challenges for professionals. STRONGLY AGREE	AgreeDevelop a better understanding of differentiating between personality styles and actual personality disorders which cause additional challenges for professionals. Agree	NeutralDevelop a better understanding of differentiating between personality styles and actual personality disorders which cause additional challenges for professionals. Neutral	DisagreeDevelop a better understanding of differentiating between personality styles and actual personality disorders which cause additional challenges for professionals. Disagree	STRONGLY DISAGREEDevelop a better understanding of differentiating between personality styles and actual personality disorders which cause additional challenges for professionals. STRONGLY DISAGREE
Enhance my skills and strategies when working with litigants with personality disorders	STRONGLY AGREEEnhance my skills and strategies when working with litigants with personality disorders STRONGLY AGREE	AgreeEnhance my skills and strategies when working with litigants with personality disorders Agree	NeutralEnhance my skills and strategies when working with litigants with personality disorders Neutral	DisagreeEnhance my skills and strategies when working with litigants with personality disorders Disagree	STRONGLY DISAGREEEnhance my skills and strategies when working with litigants with personality disorders STRONGLY DISAGREE
Improve my ability to recognize “warning signs” if reacting in unskilled manner and how to shift to more effective approach.	STRONGLY AGREEImprove my ability to recognize “warning signs” if reacting in unskilled manner and how to shift to more effective approach. STRONGLY AGREE	AgreeImprove my ability to recognize “warning signs” if reacting in unskilled manner and how to shift to more effective approach. Agree	NeutralImprove my ability to recognize “warning signs” if reacting in unskilled manner and how to shift to more effective approach. Neutral	DisagreeImprove my ability to recognize “warning signs” if reacting in unskilled manner and how to shift to more effective approach. Disagree	STRONGLY DISAGREEImprove my ability to recognize “warning signs” if reacting in unskilled manner and how to shift to more effective approach. STRONGLY DISAGREE

Session 3 - Please rate Dr. Elsa Ronningstam in Session 3 (5=Excellent, 1=Poor)

	5-EXCELLENT	4	3	2	1-POOR
Level of knowledge and expertise	5-EXCELLENTLevel of knowledge and expertise 5-EXCELLENT	4Level of knowledge and expertise 4	3Level of knowledge and expertise 3	2Level of knowledge and expertise 2	1-POORLevel of knowledge and expertise 1-POOR
Teaching ability	5-EXCELLENTTeaching ability 5-EXCELLENT	4Teaching ability 4	3Teaching ability 3	2Teaching ability 2	1-POORTeaching ability 1-POOR
Maintained my interest	5-EXCELLENTMaintained my interest 5-EXCELLENT	4Maintained my interest 4	3Maintained my interest 3	2Maintained my interest 2	1-POORMaintained my interest 1-POOR
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions	5-EXCELLENTWas responsive to questions, comments and opinions 5-EXCELLENT	4Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 4	3Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 3	2Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 2	1-POORWas responsive to questions, comments and opinions 1-POOR

Session 3 -Please rate Dr. John Lefkowits in Session 3 (5=Excellent 1=Poor)

	5-EXCELLENT	4	3	2	1-POOR
Level of knowledge and expertise	5-EXCELLENTLevel of knowledge and expertise 5-EXCELLENT	4Level of knowledge and expertise 4	3Level of knowledge and expertise 3	2Level of knowledge and expertise 2	1-POORLevel of knowledge and expertise 1-POOR
Teaching ability	5-EXCELLENTTeaching ability 5-EXCELLENT	4Teaching ability 4	3Teaching ability 3	2Teaching ability 2	1-POORTeaching ability 1-POOR
Maintained my interest	5-EXCELLENTMaintained my interest 5-EXCELLENT	4Maintained my interest 4	3Maintained my interest 3	2Maintained my interest 2	1-POORMaintained my interest 1-POOR
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions	5-EXCELLENTWas responsive to questions, comments and opinions 5-EXCELLENT	4Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 4	3Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 3	2Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 2	1-POORWas responsive to questions, comments and opinions 1-POOR

Session 4 - What Do Judges Want to Hear? This Panel Discussion helped me::

	STRONGLY AGREE	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	STRONGLY DISAGREE
Differentiate the types of mental health / personality disorder information that are most relevant to a judge’s “best interests” analysis.	STRONGLY AGREEDifferentiate the types of mental health / personality disorder information that are most relevant to a judge’s “best interests” analysis. STRONGLY AGREE	AgreeDifferentiate the types of mental health / personality disorder information that are most relevant to a judge’s “best interests” analysis. Agree	NeutralDifferentiate the types of mental health / personality disorder information that are most relevant to a judge’s “best interests” analysis. Neutral	DisagreeDifferentiate the types of mental health / personality disorder information that are most relevant to a judge’s “best interests” analysis. Disagree	STRONGLY DISAGREEDifferentiate the types of mental health / personality disorder information that are most relevant to a judge’s “best interests” analysis. STRONGLY DISAGREE
Evaluate the reliability and weight of competing information sources when a parent’s mental health is implicated.	STRONGLY AGREEEvaluate the reliability and weight of competing information sources when a parent’s mental health is implicated. STRONGLY AGREE	AgreeEvaluate the reliability and weight of competing information sources when a parent’s mental health is implicated. Agree	NeutralEvaluate the reliability and weight of competing information sources when a parent’s mental health is implicated. Neutral	DisagreeEvaluate the reliability and weight of competing information sources when a parent’s mental health is implicated. Disagree	STRONGLY DISAGREEEvaluate the reliability and weight of competing information sources when a parent’s mental health is implicated. STRONGLY DISAGREE
Formulate judicial questions and bench-level findings that meaningfully connect mental health evidence to parenting capacity, child safety, and custody/visitation decisions	STRONGLY AGREEFormulate judicial questions and bench-level findings that meaningfully connect mental health evidence to parenting capacity, child safety, and custody/visitation decisions STRONGLY AGREE	AgreeFormulate judicial questions and bench-level findings that meaningfully connect mental health evidence to parenting capacity, child safety, and custody/visitation decisions Agree	NeutralFormulate judicial questions and bench-level findings that meaningfully connect mental health evidence to parenting capacity, child safety, and custody/visitation decisions Neutral	DisagreeFormulate judicial questions and bench-level findings that meaningfully connect mental health evidence to parenting capacity, child safety, and custody/visitation decisions Disagree	STRONGLY DISAGREEFormulate judicial questions and bench-level findings that meaningfully connect mental health evidence to parenting capacity, child safety, and custody/visitation decisions STRONGLY DISAGREE

Session 4 -Please rate the Panel's overall (5=Excellent,1=Poor, )

	5-EXCELLENT	4	3	2	1-POOR
Level of knowledge and expertise	5-EXCELLENTLevel of knowledge and expertise 5-EXCELLENT	4Level of knowledge and expertise 4	3Level of knowledge and expertise 3	2Level of knowledge and expertise 2	1-POORLevel of knowledge and expertise 1-POOR
Teaching ability	5-EXCELLENTTeaching ability 5-EXCELLENT	4Teaching ability 4	3Teaching ability 3	2Teaching ability 2	1-POORTeaching ability 1-POOR
Maintained my interest	5-EXCELLENTMaintained my interest 5-EXCELLENT	4Maintained my interest 4	3Maintained my interest 3	2Maintained my interest 2	1-POORMaintained my interest 1-POOR
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions	5-EXCELLENTWas responsive to questions, comments and opinions 5-EXCELLENT	4Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 4	3Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 3	2Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 2	1-POORWas responsive to questions, comments and opinions 1-POOR

Session 5 - How Should Attorneys Present Mental Health Information to the Court? This Session will allow me to:

	STRONGLY AGREE	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	STRONGLY DISAGREE
Select, organize, and frame mental health evidence in a way that is persuasive, legally admissible, and aligned with the judge’s decision-making needs	STRONGLY AGREESelect, organize, and frame mental health evidence in a way that is persuasive, legally admissible, and aligned with the judge’s decision-making needs STRONGLY AGREE	AgreeSelect, organize, and frame mental health evidence in a way that is persuasive, legally admissible, and aligned with the judge’s decision-making needs Agree	NeutralSelect, organize, and frame mental health evidence in a way that is persuasive, legally admissible, and aligned with the judge’s decision-making needs Neutral	DisagreeSelect, organize, and frame mental health evidence in a way that is persuasive, legally admissible, and aligned with the judge’s decision-making needs Disagree	STRONGLY DISAGREESelect, organize, and frame mental health evidence in a way that is persuasive, legally admissible, and aligned with the judge’s decision-making needs STRONGLY DISAGREE
Critically evaluate expert reports and testimony to ensure that mental health testimony is credible and appropriately tied to parenting/custody issues.	STRONGLY AGREECritically evaluate expert reports and testimony to ensure that mental health testimony is credible and appropriately tied to parenting/custody issues. STRONGLY AGREE	AgreeCritically evaluate expert reports and testimony to ensure that mental health testimony is credible and appropriately tied to parenting/custody issues. Agree	NeutralCritically evaluate expert reports and testimony to ensure that mental health testimony is credible and appropriately tied to parenting/custody issues. Neutral	DisagreeCritically evaluate expert reports and testimony to ensure that mental health testimony is credible and appropriately tied to parenting/custody issues. Disagree	STRONGLY DISAGREECritically evaluate expert reports and testimony to ensure that mental health testimony is credible and appropriately tied to parenting/custody issues. STRONGLY DISAGREE
Advocate for limited confidentiality waivers and tailored disclosure orders that balance a parent’s privacy rights with the court’s need for information and propose redaction or in-camera procedures when full disclosure is inappropriate.	STRONGLY AGREEAdvocate for limited confidentiality waivers and tailored disclosure orders that balance a parent’s privacy rights with the court’s need for information and propose redaction or in-camera procedures when full disclosure is inappropriate. STRONGLY AGREE	AgreeAdvocate for limited confidentiality waivers and tailored disclosure orders that balance a parent’s privacy rights with the court’s need for information and propose redaction or in-camera procedures when full disclosure is inappropriate. Agree	NeutralAdvocate for limited confidentiality waivers and tailored disclosure orders that balance a parent’s privacy rights with the court’s need for information and propose redaction or in-camera procedures when full disclosure is inappropriate. Neutral	DisagreeAdvocate for limited confidentiality waivers and tailored disclosure orders that balance a parent’s privacy rights with the court’s need for information and propose redaction or in-camera procedures when full disclosure is inappropriate. Disagree	STRONGLY DISAGREEAdvocate for limited confidentiality waivers and tailored disclosure orders that balance a parent’s privacy rights with the court’s need for information and propose redaction or in-camera procedures when full disclosure is inappropriate. STRONGLY DISAGREE

Session 5 -Please rate the Panel's overall (5=Excellent,1=Poor, )

	5-EXCELLENT	4	3	2	1-POOR
Level of knowledge and expertise	5-EXCELLENTLevel of knowledge and expertise 5-EXCELLENT	4Level of knowledge and expertise 4	3Level of knowledge and expertise 3	2Level of knowledge and expertise 2	1-POORLevel of knowledge and expertise 1-POOR
Teaching ability	5-EXCELLENTTeaching ability 5-EXCELLENT	4Teaching ability 4	3Teaching ability 3	2Teaching ability 2	1-POORTeaching ability 1-POOR
Maintained my interest	5-EXCELLENTMaintained my interest 5-EXCELLENT	4Maintained my interest 4	3Maintained my interest 3	2Maintained my interest 2	1-POORMaintained my interest 1-POOR
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions	5-EXCELLENTWas responsive to questions, comments and opinions 5-EXCELLENT	4Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 4	3Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 3	2Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 2	1-POORWas responsive to questions, comments and opinions 1-POOR

Session 6 - Best Use of Mental Health Professionals in Family Law Matters. This Session will permit me to:

	STRONGLY AGREE	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	STRONGLY DISAGREE
Describe and distinguish the roles mental health consultants can play	STRONGLY AGREEDescribe and distinguish the roles mental health consultants can play STRONGLY AGREE	AgreeDescribe and distinguish the roles mental health consultants can play Agree	NeutralDescribe and distinguish the roles mental health consultants can play Neutral	DisagreeDescribe and distinguish the roles mental health consultants can play Disagree	STRONGLY DISAGREEDescribe and distinguish the roles mental health consultants can play STRONGLY DISAGREE
Recognize limitations in testimony that can be from a therapist vs role as a custody evaluator, vs expert witness for content or specialist in a specific field of mental health	STRONGLY AGREERecognize limitations in testimony that can be from a therapist vs role as a custody evaluator, vs expert witness for content or specialist in a specific field of mental health STRONGLY AGREE	AgreeRecognize limitations in testimony that can be from a therapist vs role as a custody evaluator, vs expert witness for content or specialist in a specific field of mental health Agree	NeutralRecognize limitations in testimony that can be from a therapist vs role as a custody evaluator, vs expert witness for content or specialist in a specific field of mental health Neutral	DisagreeRecognize limitations in testimony that can be from a therapist vs role as a custody evaluator, vs expert witness for content or specialist in a specific field of mental health Disagree	STRONGLY DISAGREERecognize limitations in testimony that can be from a therapist vs role as a custody evaluator, vs expert witness for content or specialist in a specific field of mental health STRONGLY DISAGREE

Session 6 -Please rate the Dr. Killeen's overall: (5=Excellent,1=Poor)

	5-EXCELLENT	4	3	2	1-POOR
Level of knowledge and expertise	5-EXCELLENTLevel of knowledge and expertise 5-EXCELLENT	4Level of knowledge and expertise 4	3Level of knowledge and expertise 3	2Level of knowledge and expertise 2	1-POORLevel of knowledge and expertise 1-POOR
Teaching ability	5-EXCELLENTTeaching ability 5-EXCELLENT	4Teaching ability 4	3Teaching ability 3	2Teaching ability 2	1-POORTeaching ability 1-POOR
Maintained my interest	5-EXCELLENTMaintained my interest 5-EXCELLENT	4Maintained my interest 4	3Maintained my interest 3	2Maintained my interest 2	1-POORMaintained my interest 1-POOR
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions	5-EXCELLENTWas responsive to questions, comments and opinions 5-EXCELLENT	4Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 4	3Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 3	2Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 2	1-POORWas responsive to questions, comments and opinions 1-POOR

Session 7 - Interventions in Family Court. (Panel). This Session helped me:

	STRONGLY AGREE	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	STRONGLY DISAGREE
Differentiate among key family court interventions and identify the circumstances under which each is most appropriate.	STRONGLY AGREEDifferentiate among key family court interventions and identify the circumstances under which each is most appropriate. STRONGLY AGREE	AgreeDifferentiate among key family court interventions and identify the circumstances under which each is most appropriate. Agree	NeutralDifferentiate among key family court interventions and identify the circumstances under which each is most appropriate. Neutral	DisagreeDifferentiate among key family court interventions and identify the circumstances under which each is most appropriate. Disagree	STRONGLY DISAGREEDifferentiate among key family court interventions and identify the circumstances under which each is most appropriate. STRONGLY DISAGREE
Formulate clear and concrete intervention requests that include measurable goals and outcome indicators, enabling judges and practitioners to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions in resolving custody disputes and promoting child well-being	STRONGLY AGREEFormulate clear and concrete intervention requests that include measurable goals and outcome indicators, enabling judges and practitioners to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions in resolving custody disputes and promoting child well-being STRONGLY AGREE	AgreeFormulate clear and concrete intervention requests that include measurable goals and outcome indicators, enabling judges and practitioners to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions in resolving custody disputes and promoting child well-being Agree	NeutralFormulate clear and concrete intervention requests that include measurable goals and outcome indicators, enabling judges and practitioners to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions in resolving custody disputes and promoting child well-being Neutral	DisagreeFormulate clear and concrete intervention requests that include measurable goals and outcome indicators, enabling judges and practitioners to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions in resolving custody disputes and promoting child well-being Disagree	STRONGLY DISAGREEFormulate clear and concrete intervention requests that include measurable goals and outcome indicators, enabling judges and practitioners to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions in resolving custody disputes and promoting child well-being STRONGLY DISAGREE
Apply assessment and intervention strategies to case study scenarios by analyzing presenting issues, selecting the most suitable intervention, and articulating expected outcomes that balance parental rights with the best interests of the child.	STRONGLY AGREEApply assessment and intervention strategies to case study scenarios by analyzing presenting issues, selecting the most suitable intervention, and articulating expected outcomes that balance parental rights with the best interests of the child. STRONGLY AGREE	AgreeApply assessment and intervention strategies to case study scenarios by analyzing presenting issues, selecting the most suitable intervention, and articulating expected outcomes that balance parental rights with the best interests of the child. Agree	NeutralApply assessment and intervention strategies to case study scenarios by analyzing presenting issues, selecting the most suitable intervention, and articulating expected outcomes that balance parental rights with the best interests of the child. Neutral	DisagreeApply assessment and intervention strategies to case study scenarios by analyzing presenting issues, selecting the most suitable intervention, and articulating expected outcomes that balance parental rights with the best interests of the child. Disagree	STRONGLY DISAGREEApply assessment and intervention strategies to case study scenarios by analyzing presenting issues, selecting the most suitable intervention, and articulating expected outcomes that balance parental rights with the best interests of the child. STRONGLY DISAGREE

Session 7 -Please rate the Panel's overall: (5=Excellent,1=Poor )

	5-EXCELLENT	4	3	2	1-POOR
Level of knowledge and expertise	5-EXCELLENTLevel of knowledge and expertise 5-EXCELLENT	4Level of knowledge and expertise 4	3Level of knowledge and expertise 3	2Level of knowledge and expertise 2	1-POORLevel of knowledge and expertise 1-POOR
Teaching ability	5-EXCELLENTTeaching ability 5-EXCELLENT	4Teaching ability 4	3Teaching ability 3	2Teaching ability 2	1-POORTeaching ability 1-POOR
Maintained my interest	5-EXCELLENTMaintained my interest 5-EXCELLENT	4Maintained my interest 4	3Maintained my interest 3	2Maintained my interest 2	1-POORMaintained my interest 1-POOR
Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions	5-EXCELLENTWas responsive to questions, comments and opinions 5-EXCELLENT	4Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 4	3Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 3	2Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 2	1-POORWas responsive to questions, comments and opinions 1-POOR

Overall the Conference

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
Was interactive and enhanced my learning	Strongly AgreeWas interactive and enhanced my learning Strongly Agree	AgreeWas interactive and enhanced my learning Agree	NeutralWas interactive and enhanced my learning Neutral	DisagreeWas interactive and enhanced my learning Disagree	Strongly DisagreeWas interactive and enhanced my learning Strongly Disagree
Provided knowledge I will be able to use in my work	Strongly AgreeProvided knowledge I will be able to use in my work Strongly Agree	AgreeProvided knowledge I will be able to use in my work Agree	NeutralProvided knowledge I will be able to use in my work Neutral	DisagreeProvided knowledge I will be able to use in my work Disagree	Strongly DisagreeProvided knowledge I will be able to use in my work Strongly Disagree
Met/exceeded my expectations	Strongly AgreeMet/exceeded my expectations Strongly Agree	AgreeMet/exceeded my expectations Agree	NeutralMet/exceeded my expectations Neutral	DisagreeMet/exceeded my expectations Disagree	Strongly DisagreeMet/exceeded my expectations Strongly Disagree

What part of the Conference was the most useful?

What part of the Conference was the least useful?

Do you have any suggestions for future Annual Conferences topics or other educational or training events?

Submit